From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 9b311e631ab3b8c5fb580274827e7952c2ede5d6a2a4f13b0c090e2935ceef45
Message ID: <19970827000107.12109@bywater.songbird.com>
Reply To: <1.5.4.32.19970826160822.006e89a4@pop.pipeline.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-27 07:17:29 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:17:29 +0800
From: Kent Crispin <kent@songbird.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 15:17:29 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: snuffle.c (was Re: Reuter on Bernstein Ruling)
In-Reply-To: <1.5.4.32.19970826160822.006e89a4@pop.pipeline.com>
Message-ID: <19970827000107.12109@bywater.songbird.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Tue, Aug 26, 1997 at 11:15:28PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>
> snuffle and unsnuffle are only 64 lines each... so here they are. You
> need snefru also (snuffle for those not following is a construction to
> convert a hash function into an encryption function ... Bernstein's
> example is set up to use snefru ... a hash function).
[...]
>
> Shall we reimplement it in perl?
I'm sure you would enjoy the exercise. However, I think it will
probably sound better in C :-) [ftp://songbird.com/pub/snuffle.mid
-- I may build up a collection of these...]
> Adam
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
Return to September 1997
Return to “Vijo Cherian <vijo@vikram.svrec.ernet.in>”