From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Message Hash: a57e7a6040ff361a37bd3274ceaf131c6f28ef7928db0c10c6d2cb2bd5d8a146
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970813163859.275B-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <4FoBBe4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-13 17:05:59 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 01:05:59 +0800
From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 01:05:59 +0800
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <dlv@bwalk.dm.com>
Subject: Re: Guy Polis
In-Reply-To: <4FoBBe4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970813163859.275B-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> > drunken rants are one thing, and are easily deleted, but impersonating me
> > is straight out of Detweiler's book. Must be something about Cypherpunks
> > that brings out this urge to impersonate.
>
> Toto's drunked rants and the most valuable traffic on this mailing list
> these days - I read them and usually save them. Tim May's censorship
> rants make him sonnd like kent Krispin.
I agree, Toto makes some of the best posts to the list, they are often
just humurous one-liners but he also makes a lot of excellent
observations and is very good at predicting the way things will go, as
far as I`m concerned his posts are up there in quality with those of TCM,
Adam Back, Dr.V, Bill Stwart, William Geiger and the other regular good
posters.
> How do we know that Tim May didn't post the alleged forgery himself
> and didn't munge the headers to point to Toto?
Not his style (as far as I know it), but I agree there is no evidence to the
contrary.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to August 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”