From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
To: “Robert W. Brewer” <rbrewer@op.net>
Message Hash: b418b303010e4f2f0ab5f7a167e3b98f701566db3075f3bedf8eb5aca40738c6
Message ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731182538.426E-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Reply To: <m3pvrz92rd.fsf_-_@wiz.rob.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-02 14:11:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:11:40 +0800
From: Paul Bradley <paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
Date: Sat, 2 Aug 1997 22:11:40 +0800
To: "Robert W. Brewer" <rbrewer@op.net>
Subject: Re: Spam is Information?
In-Reply-To: <m3pvrz92rd.fsf_-_@wiz.rob.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970731182538.426E-100000@fatmans.demon.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
> almost totally redundant. Instead of posting 1 message,
> 1000 messages are posted. The 2nd through 1000th message
> add no more information than the first. This would not be a
> problem if the network had infinite bandwidth and storage
> capabilities.
1. When a message is cross-posted using the "newsgroups:" line only one
copy is sent to the news-spool and is seen in all the relevent newsgroups.
2. Bandwidth requirements are no justification for censorship, unless you
own the equipment you are removing the messages from, even then it is
reprehensible.
Datacomms Technologies data security
Paul Bradley, Paul@fatmans.demon.co.uk
Paul@crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul@cryptography.uk.eu.org
Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/
Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85
"Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"
Return to August 1997
Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@amaranth.com>”