From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: “Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM” <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Message Hash: c2b2eddccb2365517d175f0932c94806917ddd32dae58c06fddc9da4b5512d44
Message ID: <199708302005.QAA28553@mx02.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-30 20:14:35 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 04:14:35 +0800
From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 1997 04:14:35 +0800
To: "Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM" <cypherpunks@toad.com>
Subject: Re: Shrinks as Narcs for the State
Message-ID: <199708302005.QAA28553@mx02.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 8/30/97 12:00 PM, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM (dlv@bwalk.dm.com) passed
this wisdom:
>Can the priest be prosecuted for not telling the cops about the confession?
Unless something has radically changed the sanctity of the Catholic
confessional has never been breeched involuntarily ... i.e.,I do not
believe that any court has ever successfully compelled a priest to
divulge what he has heard in the confessional.
Of course a problem lies in the construction of the question ... its
easier to want to try to breech the confessional when you speak of a guy
talking about killing a hundred people as opposed to a guy talking about
stealing a candy bar. In various ethics discussions on this subject over
the years it usually seems to comes down to the fact that morally the
priest is bound to try to do something to stop the carnage without
divulging what he was told.
Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr
For PGP Keys - Send Email Subject "Get PGP Key"
"When I die, please cast my ashes upon Bill Gates. For once, let him
clean up after me! " - Christian Worley
Return to August 1997
Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”
1997-08-30 (Sun, 31 Aug 1997 04:14:35 +0800) - Re: Shrinks as Narcs for the State - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>