1997-08-24 - Re: Reproductive Rights and State Benefits (fwd)

Header Data

From: Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
To: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Message Hash: c38de281539954959cb6079afe0ad839c0fb382d987b45e918b4293378bc66e1
Message ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970824000835.1728B-100000@cavern.uark.edu>
Reply To: <199708240347.WAA28140@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-24 05:17:39 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 13:17:39 +0800

Raw message

From: Mac Norton <mnorton@cavern.uark.edu>
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 1997 13:17:39 +0800
To: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Reproductive Rights and State Benefits (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199708240347.WAA28140@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970824000835.1728B-100000@cavern.uark.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On Sat, 23 Aug 1997, Jim Choate wrote:
> If accepted as fact this provides even less reason for the 14th. As it
> clearly does not prevent federal rights over-riding state rights.

Jeez, it's too late to conduct Con Law Seminar 701, but focus
on "liberty" in the 14th Amendment as transfering the Bill Of
Rights, or most of it, to govern the states as well.  OK?
Cause that's the SCt's view of it, and as I've said, it seems
to work reasonably well, reagardless of the chinks in the logic.
MacN






Thread