From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: dd13c6697b1716c28cbf18e952fc846765b46bb4fb226357343263f41558b1ff
Message ID: <199708210133.DAA02325@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-21 01:33:50 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Wed, 20 Aug 1997 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP 5.0
Message-ID: <199708210133.DAA02325@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
John Wiley Councill IV wrote:
>
> How secure is a message encrypted with a 4096 bit key via PGP 5.0; what
> kind of processing power and resources would be required to crack such a
> message?
A pencil, a slide rule, and 40 trillion pieces of legal size paper.
Return to August 1997
Return to “nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)”
1997-08-21 (Wed, 20 Aug 1997 18:33:50 -0700 (PDT)) - Re: PGP 5.0 - nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)