1997-08-09 - Re: forged cancels (Re: Entrust Technologies’s Solo - free

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: e21769e5e7f2e19e110e9a9c7b18630512eeacb0395912664144fdbf166b9e92
Message ID: <u8J7ae105w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970809092959.337B-100000@shirley>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-09 18:25:59 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 02:25:59 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 02:25:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: forged cancels (Re: Entrust Technologies's Solo - free
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.93.970809092959.337B-100000@shirley>
Message-ID: <u8J7ae105w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



? the Platypus {aka David Formosa} <dformosa@st.nepean.uws.edu.au> writes:

> On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote:
>
> > > What if the message is
> > > forged in such a way that it looks exactly as if it came from you?
> >
> > Ditto, and consider setting up a service to automatically issue NoCeMs
> > for forgeries.
>
> In fact consider setting up a service to automatically issue NoCeMs for
> bad pgp sigs.

As I've discussed in private e-mail with a large number of ppl, this
would be an excellent idea, and would encurage the use of digital sigs.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread