From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: hua@chromatic.com
Message Hash: ec786e32d11e3f07cc18aa1a03ee7478d6ad145eaf304856dcc0fee5f4ecf630
Message ID: <199708262203.XAA00906@server.test.net>
Reply To: <199708261758.KAA25147@ohio.chromatic.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-26 23:16:22 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 07:16:22 +0800
From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 1997 07:16:22 +0800
To: hua@chromatic.com
Subject: Re: need confirmation of DVD/CSS crack in China ...
In-Reply-To: <199708261758.KAA25147@ohio.chromatic.com>
Message-ID: <199708262203.XAA00906@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com> writes:
> [snip]
Don't know if it's true but this ...
Ern's forwarded text:
> > Third, the entertainment industry giants will have to improve and
> > agree on an encryption technology. The current 40-bit encryption
> > standard used on DVD discs, which is supposed to stop copyright
> > pirates, has already been cracked in China.
40 bit encryption obvious that can be broken...
> > Stronger encryption, however, forces PCs and players to run at a
> > crawl.
This sounds wrong to me. Many strong ciphers run just as fast if not
faster than weak ciphers. Eg 128 bit RC4 runs at the exact same speed
as 40 bit RC4. IDEA & CAST are pretty fast, etc.
> > Partially as a result, Fox, Paramount, and Disney have not committed
> > to producing materials on DVD, Burdon noted.
DVD with stupid copy protection is bad anyway. Copright police are
getting too much influence.
Adam
--
Have *you* exported RSA today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/
print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`
Return to August 1997
Return to “Ernest Hua <hua@chromatic.com>”