From: Charles <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f1bb163fcc8a8a132edc49bea3881f9e0f4e4d2763b2d464935e61023db9f4e3
Message ID: <199708061713.DAA09431@bear.apana.org.au>
Reply To: <19970806075802.12530@bywater.songbird.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-08-06 18:30:33 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 02:30:33 +0800
From: Charles <apache@bear.apana.org.au>
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 1997 02:30:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: bulk postage fine (was Re: non-censorous spam control)
In-Reply-To: <19970806075802.12530@bywater.songbird.com>
Message-ID: <199708061713.DAA09431@bear.apana.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Kent Crispin said:
>On Sun, Aug 03, 1997 at 12:29:37PM +0100, Adam Back wrote:
>> Here's the sequence of events as I see it:
>>
>> 1. spammer spams you with adverisement for phone sex line
>> 2. you try to sue phone sex line company
>> 3. phone sex company denies all knowledge
>> 4. government says all email must be authenticated
>> 5. government issues internet drivers license
>> 6. anonymous remailers work around authentication requirement
>> 7. government outlaws remailers
>>
>> See any flaws in that logical and undesirable sequence of events?
>
>The flaws become apparent if you try to attach a *realistic*
>probability to each step.
Wasn't the UPS trying to promote some system of authentication (where you
pay just as like you purchase postage stamps now) at a trade show of some
description in the US this year or late last year? I recall a post on
this to this list but can't recall the detail. Anyone recall the details
of that post?
I know last year the australian post office suggested such a role for
themselves and they didn't see it as a voluntary proposal. I haven't
heard anything from them lately so maybe it was all just too difficult.
- --
.////. .// Charles Senescall apache@bear.apana.org.au
o:::::::::/// PGP mail preferred apache@quux.apana.org.au
>::::::::::\\\ Finger me @bear for PGP PUBKEY Brisbane AUSTRALIA
'\\\\\' \\ Apache
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQEVAwUBM+iwwXawhvoxf0r9AQGnTwf/ZvFB+PlCUqiNvXoPmkhDSw3YlBfOjpW2
4JnOeKA3kLys23FMKvSeNd1BulrKhVwVZGpGHCsOS7/aiyxvshZb3Mjakw20mV6Z
O0gy/Si1yOLVk65e3vXWsn78xPdfXmvTEdwiFEGT3/HvICzuWzfbUIJkhdmDXK3j
D8uXE+p97NYyMscg1+qlZzD3D4uIl5jwht/giu+ztVtjJgGYqmMk4z9WZ3Vk245N
RAYhF3zgeJz/cTxNTTlT8v05kbJOcZJJlRHMLE3BlCSSY338hnXuodttc54JEoEZ
Gb04DO12bphTW2sdIqdxmQY9jjAxlO10w3CHlzuB2G05x/lyakScWg==
=lS/d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to August 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”