From: jf_avon@citenet.net
To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com, cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 0e2ec3aa66c9d16befdb2a0dbecfb09e65b202da77e1912f06bf7e99313287b3
Message ID: <199709161324.JAA02545@cti06.citenet.net>
Reply To: <v0311071fb042f4760f25@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-16 13:27:30 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:27:30 +0800
From: jf_avon@citenet.net
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 1997 21:27:30 +0800
To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com, cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: GAK will probably be economically impossible
In-Reply-To: <v0311071fb042f4760f25@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <199709161324.JAA02545@cti06.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 15 Sep 97 at 10:19, Robert Hettinga wrote:
> In fact, even if all transactions remain book-entry ones, the exploding
> total transaction volume and competition to make those transactions
> efficient will make GAK economically impossible, because it provides no
> tangible benefit to those who use cryptography for business. There's no
> economic return on the additional cost.
>
> The cost of anything is the foregone alternative, and the cost of GAK
> causes you to forego a lot of money and potential revenue and doesn't buy
> you anything in return.
In the long term, you are right. But taxation doesn't buy much in
return that you couldn't buy by yourself either but they still do
it...
But again, the incentives are differents from their standpoint...
Ciao
jfa
Return to September 1997
Return to “jf_avon@citenet.net”
Unknown thread root