From: Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>
To: “‘Lizard’” <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>
Message Hash: 1b04f0814f3f6da9a77e58a07cfa61f4f93061ff9fc118636a0e5455597fda2c
Message ID: <01BCC9C9.8B78F1E0.aweissman@mocc.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 22:20:09 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:20:09 +0800
From: Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:20:09 +0800
To: "'Lizard'" <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>
Subject: RE: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd)
Message-ID: <01BCC9C9.8B78F1E0.aweissman@mocc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Thursday, September 25, 1997 12:00 PM, Lizard [SMTP:lizard@dnai.com]
wrote:
> But to do that, you see, you'll need warrents, reasons for
> suspiscion, and, becuase of the effort involved, you'll only do it
> for serious crimes with a strong liklihood of conviction. *That* is
> the 'stauts quo' law enforcement *claims* to want.
and the technical realities of encryption, plus the limitations of any
"NETCenter," will force a respect for, or at least compliance with, the 4th
amendment. Hooray!
Aaron
Return to September 1997
Return to “Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>”
1997-09-25 (Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:20:09 +0800) - RE: Why the White amendment is a good idea (fwd) - Aaron Weissman <aweissman@mocc.com>