1997-09-12 - Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto

Header Data

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 1f5fc7dcbdf634476553edb4b54ff76857d7aaf96068a99756b6ea0ff6224b1a
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970911210020.0070ba78@netcom10.netcom.com>
Reply To: <01BCBEC8.8E34E8A0.wathab@tiac.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-12 04:32:12 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:32:12 +0800

Raw message

From: Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 12:32:12 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: More on House Intelligence committee amendment on crypto
In-Reply-To: <01BCBEC8.8E34E8A0.wathab@tiac.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970911210020.0070ba78@netcom10.netcom.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 03:38 PM 9/11/97 -0700, Declan McCullagh wrote:
>So I'm reading through the 43-page amendment to SAFE that the House
>Intelligence committee approved today. It includes: 
>
>* Ban on sale of crypto without a backdoor. Five year & fine (maybe
>$250,000?) if violated. Prosecutions can be held in closed-door
>courtrooms, publishers of info about case to be held in contempt of court.

Does the bill retain the 5 years first offense, 10 years second offense
provisions for using crypto in the comission of a crime?

Let's see: Lucky sells five copies of PGP. That's 5+(5+4*10)=50 years in
prison. Or is it (5*5)+(5+4*10)=70 years? Doesn't make much of a difference
at my age, I suppose.


--Lucky Green <shamrock@netcom.com>
  PGP encrypted mail preferred.
  DES is dead! Please join in breaking RC5-56.
  http://rc5.distributed.net/






Thread