1997-09-20 - Freeh peachs / Re: directed speech free? request for opinions.

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 2868c6407c3428fe6f5b41fcf4050dc908ef86488ff1040a37522c90c7b13178
Message ID: <199709200010.CAA14440@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-20 00:18:40 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 08:18:40 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 08:18:40 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Freeh peachs / Re: directed speech free? request for opinions.
Message-ID: <199709200010.CAA14440@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Mark Hedges wrote:
> 
> I have seen California law code which seems to indicate that speech
> directed at an individual is not covered under the first amendment.
> 
> if you know of any speech
> rights scholars or lawyers willing to answer a few related questions for
> free, I would appreciate the pointer.

  If their answer is in regard to a speech by Freeh, then it would be
free speech about free speech about a Freeh speech.
  If not, it would be about Freeh-free free speech.

WordMonger







Thread