1997-09-22 - Re: encouraging digital pseudonyms (fwd)

Header Data

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Message Hash: 3418959d0f8bcc926cc3150f118b5d66568357f2487be0929abaf81db2585fcf
Message ID: <199709230005.TAA17421@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-22 23:58:45 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 07:58:45 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 07:58:45 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com (Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer)
Subject: Re: encouraging digital pseudonyms (fwd)
Message-ID: <199709230005.TAA17421@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text



Forwarded message:

> Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 17:45:58 -0400
> From: "Robert A. Costner" <pooh@efga.org>
> Subject: Re: encouraging digital pseudonyms

> Perhaps I am missing something here.  I find it easy to distinguish type-I
> anonymous traffic from nym mail.  Anonymous mail usually comes from an
> address like 'anon@' or 'nobody@' while pseudonymous mail will come from a
> pseudonym.

A pseudonym and an anonymous account are NOT the same thing. That is what
you are missing.

'ravage' is a 'nym that I have been using since about '82 or '83 (I used
'ogre' and 'ghost' before that), I have NEVER used an account such as
'anon<foo>@bar.com' while I do generate traffic under other short-term
'nym's.

The only reason anonymous mail comes as 'anon@' or 'nobody@' is because that
is the way they are currently set up. If an anon-remailer were serious about
long-term survival the output accounts would look just like the user
accounts and not something as blatent as the above.

Anonymous remailers will have arrived when they quit using the simple
patterning as above and they figure out how to charge for their services
(anonymous privacy is a commodity with a worth, seriously undervalued in
todays market).


    ____________________________________________________________________
   |                                                                    |
   |    The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there   |
   |    be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves.       |
   |                                                                    |
   |                                       -Alan Greenspan-             |
   |                                                                    | 
   |            _____                             The Armadillo Group   |
   |         ,::////;::-.                           Austin, Tx. USA     |
   |        /:'///// ``::>/|/                     http:// www.ssz.com/  |
   |      .',  ||||    `/( e\                                           |
   |  -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'-                         Jim Choate       |
   |                                                 ravage@ssz.com     |
   |                                                  512-451-7087      |
   |____________________________________________________________________|






Thread