1997-09-12 - Re: Court proceedings under new SAFE act

Header Data

From: “James S. Tyre” <j.s.tyre@worldnet.att.net>
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Message Hash: 5a34219203baaa335b4afbb42f749be5256f8db0995e4c494afdbf056215e9c0
Message ID: <3418A06A.2C40@worldnet.att.net>
Reply To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970911175628.12105l-100000@well.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-12 02:03:40 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:03:40 +0800

Raw message

From: "James S. Tyre" <j.s.tyre@worldnet.att.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 10:03:40 +0800
To: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Subject: Re: Court proceedings under new SAFE act
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.95.970911175628.12105l-100000@well.com>
Message-ID: <3418A06A.2C40@worldnet.att.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> I'm reading the bill more closely. This is incredibly slick work.
> 
> 1. When it appears that any person is selling, importing, or distributing
> non-backdoor'd crypto or "about" to do so, the Atty General can sue to
> stop them. "Upon the filing of the complaint seeking injunctive relief by
> the Attorney General, the court shall automatically issue a temporary
> restraining order against the party being sued." 

Fucking A, Declan!  (A highly precise legal term of art for all you
laypeople out there.)  Even if these guys don't give a shit about the
First Amendment, or have forgotten how hard it is to get a prior
restraint Order, have they excised the Separation of Powers doctrine
from the Constitution too?

oh.forgot.national security.never mind.

-Jim






Thread