From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
To: trei@process.com
Message Hash: 5c0bd8113738dd0f91db0cce1cbbe895c2a929f1e8c2720182b0b83288528b8b
Message ID: <3.0.3.32.19970925174308.03286100@cybercash.com>
Reply To: <199709251409.KAA00832@callandor.cybercash.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-25 22:24:26 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:24:26 +0800
From: Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 06:24:26 +0800
To: trei@process.com
Subject: Re: Emphasizing a point by Donald Eastlake re key recovery
In-Reply-To: <199709251409.KAA00832@callandor.cybercash.com>
Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19970925174308.03286100@cybercash.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
At 10:25 AM 9/25/97 -6, Peter Trei wrote:
>Well, I dunno. About 18 months ago, I was involved with the
>negotiations over the exportability of an SSL equipped web
>server I had helped develop. The export model used 40 bit RC4
>and 512 bit keys. The initial version used 3DES to encrypt
>stored private keys, and this was turned down. I modified it to
>use single DES, and it passed.
>
>Note that this was for secret key storage only.
This should be listed as yet another outrage of the current system --
perhaps reason to start another lawsuit.
- Carl
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNCra7FQXJENzYr45AQECaQP/aqrptzzWdwjJsseEtIKGckIg0mXLRAFk
APtO4O4hzeZJDVJ7QPKtJc6BqSU8uT5gs44rJR3SrUZ3g0D5RG4zyjue30Drhyor
bmqQKJXsbtIW/wk0uPXA3EyfRusjUr51yVjPdkwhRsh6ta5YIvAusTAonSjAoJrf
AL+F9+pFBPw=
=yC89
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
|Carl M. Ellison cme@cybercash.com http://www.clark.net/pub/cme |
|CyberCash, Inc. http://www.cybercash.com/ |
|207 Grindall Street PGP 2.6.2: 61E2DE7FCB9D7984E9C8048BA63221A2 |
|Baltimore MD 21230-4103 T:(410) 727-4288 F:(410)727-4293 |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
Return to September 1997
Return to “Carl Ellison <cme@cybercash.com>”
Unknown thread root