From: “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 5f0ed80bd793624dbb287e4b9765ea2fecaf95ec4db0befffa5cc5ce949e5d42
Message ID: <199709181407.HAA05208@toad.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-18 14:22:34 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:22:34 +0800
From: "Peter Trei" <trei@process.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:22:34 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE
Message-ID: <199709181407.HAA05208@toad.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
"Peter D. Junger" <junger@upaya.multiverse.com> writes:
> I do not want to give Congress any ideas, but there is also the
> possibility that they could take away the federal courts' jurisdiction
> to hear constitutional questions without amending the constitution.
> On the other hand it is possible that the courts would find a way to
> hold that that limitation on their jurisdiction is unconstitutional.
> Peter D. Junger--Case Western Reserve University Law School--Cleveland, OH
If Congress or the Executive branch do this, the American people and
nation will be in far, far deeper trouble than would be caused by mere
crypto restrictions.
Peter Trei
trei@process.com
Return to September 1997
Return to ““Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>”
1997-09-18 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 22:22:34 +0800) - Re: National Security Committee amendments to SAFE - “Peter Trei” <trei@process.com>