From: Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
To: declan@well.com
Message Hash: 6f1d7796d2ac78a6d67da1a381bc767dc0c31acef3c12a0a7f390944247ffb80
Message ID: <v03102801b052ed7ae853@[17.219.102.28]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-27 17:41:16 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:41:16 +0800
From: Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:41:16 +0800
To: declan@well.com
Subject: No Subject
Message-ID: <v03102801b052ed7ae853@[17.219.102.28]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
>From <http://www.scripting.com/davenet/stories/BillGatesonPrivacy.html>
(an e-mail from Bill Gates to Dave Winer)
Bill Gates on Privacy
>From Bill Gates, billg@microsoft.com:
Since I last sent you email on this topic things have gotten a lot worse.
The FBI and the Administration have bills in both the Congress and the
Senate that would force all software sold in the United State by 1999
to allow the government to get at the keys without the user knowing.
Besides the issues of this making it very difficult for us to sell
software to countries like Germany and Canada who want strong encryption
without any backdoor and the issue of how to have the old software work
with the new, there is a huge issue of privacy here. The backdoors that the
government is requiring would create a huge security hole that could be
misused.
I am spending a lot of time on this - calling Congressman and Senators.
However the FBI and the administration are suggesting that restricting
the software industry is key to fighting criminals. Of course they don't
say that criminals will still find it very easy to pre-encrypt the
information they send.
For some reason the public isn't hearing about this issue at all. I
can't believe there isn't more of an outcry. When it went from an
export restriction to a restriction on sofware in the US there should
have been a lot of headlines.
Return to September 1997
Return to “Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>”
1997-09-27 (Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:41:16 +0800) - No Subject - Martin Minow <minow@apple.com>