From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 7e46ba4cbbd9355a89375ca588f5c38a273ad9719601c3d53d3b313a8ea7cd99
Message ID: <8b648aa61709b5c33e4397393b2e5c09@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-28 21:11:50 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:11:50 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:11:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Remailer latencies
Message-ID: <8b648aa61709b5c33e4397393b2e5c09@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
David E. Smith wrote:
>> If so, what accounts for these message losses? I would expect that
>> if your machine was down, even for a couple of days, that the
>> incoming messages would be queued up on other machines and none
>> would be lost.
>
>It's more like "of the last 1000 messages sent, 9964 of 'em have made
>it back to me." Because of the way I have to have things set up,
>there are almost always a few messages in transit. I have, very
>occasionally, actually seen my remailer listed at 100%; somewhere
>over 99% is far more common.
But, presumably Raph waits awhile for the message before deciding the
machine is down? If I understand correctly, you are saying that
messages don't actually disappear, but they are sometimes delayed for
longer than the two days Raph waits* for them to come back.
(* Assumption made on the basis that his timing data doesn't describe
any delays longer than two days.)
>For me, the remailer doesn't consume any exceptional new resources,
>so the added cost to me of running a remailer is very nearly zero.
>(Those are mostly the "administrative" costs of dealing with
>complaints, adding people to the blocklist, and cleaning up after the
>occasional spam bomb.) Others, with different circumstances, may be
>more eager to pursue a profit-making solution.
It could cover the cost of that second line. ;-)
If you haven't tried ecash, you might enjoy it. Setting up your
remailer to accept it is a lot easier than you might think.
Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBNC6PkZaWtjSmRH/5AQEg9Qf9F+GGZF733IDPbjuRSpIqH5KhhTVJTDMQ
JCbzZdwfqvjzRvv6El/xH1y0cMvpcd2xes+QF3HMxRL+XU9tGpQOUwyBHXvTi247
sXB5TfgXLYowOjeR/PbjnT06SBG1ygj2kxe+0CZc9OQWlWgliMQG0OxPw3p/A3On
WR7fxnlweRlPiDMZdXq/DMMpDs/Se+ypFpKZriTeS6iWzBG2Bi+F+GKHBEa3V7M9
hnVxGiFE0TnirII0n/h8yFcpQ/ULTG/Z3wqOxyZOvkaVyZlPCAl4mM0AOIWgNeZt
HeSk18TERHcRg5u+QeeDRKnNQepeN3UJ5g/NYCGzaRe79f3SMg83mw==
=zom6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-09-28 (Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:11:50 +0800) - Re: Remailer latencies - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>