From: Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: 878cc705bb75b18af50ae2e9f9fd7518d603fc62e351679588bb2a3ff421d077
Message ID: <199709291643.SAA05265@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-29 17:11:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:11:48 +0800
From: Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:11:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <199709291643.SAA05265@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
[..]
: Then Mr. Cantsin seemed to go back to the all you need are some spare parts
: theory of remailer operation. Enormous profits of $200 per month, or even
: $5,000 per year. Well, Cracker handles close to 25% of worldwide remailer
: traffic of it's kind[1]. And it's not much. I would say this is due
: mainly to the user interface. Making remailers more difficult to use by
: adding Ecash is not going to increase traffic significantly.
Basicly most of those 3400 message cracker handles daily are cover trafic,
a big chunk of the rest is from people "playing" around with the remailer,
then there are those few that needs some form of anonimity so they can inform
a mailinglist/postmaster/complaints department, and then maybe once a week
or so there is that message that would be paid for if remailers were for pay.
So in short, if remailers were to be paid for, traffic would halt.
--
Alex de Joode | usura@SABOTAGE.ORG | http://www.sabotage.org
Sabotage Internet: Your Internet Problem Provider.
Return to September 1997
Return to “Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>”
1997-09-29 (Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:11:48 +0800) - Re: Remailers and ecash - Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>