1997-09-29 - Re: Remailers and ecash

Header Data

From: Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Message Hash: 878cc705bb75b18af50ae2e9f9fd7518d603fc62e351679588bb2a3ff421d077
Message ID: <199709291643.SAA05265@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-29 17:11:48 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:11:48 +0800

Raw message

From: Alex de Joode <usura@sabotage.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 1997 01:11:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@ssz.com
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <199709291643.SAA05265@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



[..]
: Then Mr. Cantsin seemed to go back to the all you need are some spare parts
: theory of remailer operation.  Enormous profits of $200 per month, or even
: $5,000 per year.  Well, Cracker handles close to 25% of worldwide remailer
: traffic of it's kind[1].  And it's not much.  I would say this is due
: mainly to the user interface.  Making remailers more difficult to use by
: adding Ecash is not going to increase traffic significantly.

Basicly most of those 3400 message cracker handles daily are cover trafic,
a big chunk of the rest is from people "playing" around with the remailer,
then there are those few that needs some form of anonimity so they can inform
a mailinglist/postmaster/complaints department, and then maybe once a week
or so there is that message that would be paid for if remailers were for pay.

So in short, if remailers were to be paid for, traffic would halt.

--
  Alex de Joode | usura@SABOTAGE.ORG | http://www.sabotage.org
	Sabotage Internet: Your Internet Problem Provider.






Thread