cryptoanarchy.wiki

Arise, you have nothing to lose but your barbed wire fences!

1997-09-28 - Re: Remailers and ecash

Header Data

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Message Hash: 9e81b54f8f43a53afb7a7c2997fc755f1f9c5c995b321a56655c97d05ff461c4
Message ID: <199709280019.BAA00445@server.test.net>
Reply To: <d9ad723431a59140b039a71c9cecc923@anon.efga.org>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-28 00:31:49 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 08:31:49 +0800

Raw message

From: Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 08:31:49 +0800
To: anon@anon.efga.org
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
In-Reply-To: <d9ad723431a59140b039a71c9cecc923@anon.efga.org>
Message-ID: <199709280019.BAA00445@server.test.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain




Monty Cantsin writes:
> Just out of a curiousity, why is it that no remailers accept ecash?
> (This is not a jibe at remailer operators or authors of remailer
> software.  I am really curious if this is a "didn't get to it yet"
> sort of thing, or if there's something hard about it.)

I think someone did write the code.  I think it was Sameer, and I
think he ran a remailer with this feature for a while.  I expect the
code is on the berkeley ftp site somewhere.

Adam
-- 
Now officially an EAR violation...
Have *you* violated EAR today? --> http://www.dcs.ex.ac.uk/~aba/rsa/

print pack"C*",split/\D+/,`echo "16iII*o\U@{$/=$z;[(pop,pop,unpack"H*",<>
)]}\EsMsKsN0[lN*1lK[d2%Sa2/d0<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<J]dsJxp"|dc`

Thread