From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 01:38:04 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Remailers and ecash
Message-ID: <98686f498b8ccb27fd4ca5d615f6710e@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Steve Schear wrote:
>At 3:18 AM -0400 9/27/97, Anonymous (sic) wrote:
>>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>
>>Just out of a curiousity, why is it that no remailers accept ecash?
>>(This is not a jibe at remailer operators or authors of remailer
>>software.  I am really curious if this is a "didn't get to it yet"
>>sort of thing, or if there's something hard about it.)
>
>One item which has been missing is an accessible API. (The Digicash
>merchant software is, I believe, designed for online use only.)  This
>need is about to be fulfilled.

Digicash has software for Unix platforms which one could very easily
call from a Perl script.  Sure, it wouldn't be pretty, it wouldn't be
ideal, but it would work and should be easy to incorporate into many
of the remailers.  (I think.)

Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAwUBNC02bJaWtjSmRH/5AQEgjgf+MoJMWJpMfStaIvIzGZOhv9NQRPzAWU/V
USmABIwZ4BmkhL+gC7urltqzK9ILgNUPXvxtOTZXJGXm7LX8NApT6P6vvyNC4OZP
jYqQUFZo3eEhQdKiW9xVaq7l7ZovaR7uNfxUnV5bzniXs1dIQJQ1hPVMU8+gW+2D
g49nyGxS0gA4CFZFDDepd7fhDYiZgzOi2fVha+Vtz0fJZ4Lx9LoVb+Ce/bijGmkU
OHkgCqYm3UwZlLZp7FY4pDt0r/7QdYcAayhCAFgDiCxE5o2c+WN3O0a9cqNHuFhx
tBycQBfYewLNHn7FshBZF1pMm7FMp01i07y5AVogCleSqZdH8gJrEg==
=si/v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----