1997-09-02 - Re: You really do want to volunteer, don’t you?

Header Data

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: b8c840c4fe9e26f610fa873410a5b56c654dd8cb21c53ca5b9033f046b1b4fe8
Message ID: <3.0.2.32.19970902001252.006e3cd8@pop.sirius.com>
Reply To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970901233826.9189A-100000@rigel.cyberpass.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-02 07:20:59 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:20:59 +0800

Raw message

From: Greg Broiles <gbroiles@netbox.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 1997 15:20:59 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: You really do want to volunteer, don't you?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.96.970901233826.9189A-100000@rigel.cyberpass.net>
Message-ID: <3.0.2.32.19970902001252.006e3cd8@pop.sirius.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



At 11:38 PM 9/1/97 -0700, Tim May wrote:
>This was an actual case, heard by the Supreme Court several years back. Bus
>passengers were given the opportunity to volunteer, as noted. Failure to
>volunteer was construed as probable cause that contraband was present.
>
>(No, I don't know the name of the case. My recollection is that it took
>place in Florida or one of the Carolinas. Nor do I recollect how the
>Supremes decided the case...

This sounds like _Florida v. Bostick_, 501 U.S. 429 (1991), on the web at 
<http://www.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=US&navby=case&vol=501&invol
=429>.

Bill Stewart's summary of the case looked like a good one to me. 


--
Greg Broiles                | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell:
gbroiles@netbox.com         | 
http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto.
                            | 






Thread