1997-09-18 - Crypto-law etc

Header Data

From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@FreeGate.net>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: c5cbbeb14290a21268b253eba547b261fb23a372b8543ad4b369a03e35889859
Message ID: <3420310E.ADFFE243@FreeGate.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-18 06:46:18 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 14:46:18 +0800

Raw message

From: Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@FreeGate.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 1997 14:46:18 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Crypto-law etc
Message-ID: <3420310E.ADFFE243@FreeGate.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



The longer I follow the crypto "debate" the more I begin to
understand what must have been the real intent behind the
2nd amendment of the constitution.

If the White House can get crypto code defined in the true
legal sense (that is backed up by case law) as a munition,
do US citizens then have a constitutional right to "bear" it?

Just curious,
--Chuck

Thread

• Return to September 1997

• Return to “Alexander <alex.guy@software.com>”
• Return to “Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@FreeGate.net>”

• Return to ““William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>”

• 1997-09-18 (Thu, 18 Sep 1997 14:46:18 +0800) - Crypto-law etc - Chuck McManis <cmcmanis@FreeGate.net>
  • 1997-09-18 (Fri, 19 Sep 1997 02:14:05 +0800) - Re: Crypto-law etc - Alexander <alex.guy@software.com>
    • 1997-09-18 (Fri, 19 Sep 1997 02:35:18 +0800) - Re: Crypto-law etc - “William H. Geiger III” <whgiii@invweb.net>