1997-09-18 - Re: PGP signature legal standing?

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: cdfe5cdb388bb96fcc67c8e05a419e5ac85dd589cf91f43aa2383bbb5a2a78da
Message ID: <qDg9ce1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <19970918145759.25884.qmail@desk.crynwr.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-18 17:41:47 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:41:47 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 1997 01:41:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: PGP signature legal standing?
In-Reply-To: <19970918145759.25884.qmail@desk.crynwr.com>
Message-ID: <qDg9ce1w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Russell Nelson <nelson@crynwr.com> writes:

> Is there any legal standing for a PGP signature?  I'm tired of my
> luser customers faxing me legal documents, then expecting me to sign
> it and fax it back.  Yeah, right, like photoshop can't cut-n-paste.
> I've got a fax modem on my Linux box, so I'm going to start (in fact
> have started) uuencoding the .g3 file, indicating my assent, and
> emailing it back to them.

IANAL, but: what if you first sign a paper contract saying that PGP
signatres are binding?

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread