From: jf_avon@citenet.net
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: d6d82af3420451de47406747897bf34978aa1a2856d90460fc92ac5e99e0ecf5
Message ID: <199709140128.VAA28974@cti06.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-14 01:29:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800
From: jf_avon@citenet.net
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Real issue of crypto controls: security or taxation loss?
Message-ID: <199709140128.VAA28974@cti06.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 13 Sep 97 at 9:19, Tim May wrote:
> (JF won't see this, unless Bob H. chooses to pass it on, Sandy-style. This
> on unedited, undelayed lists, not on digests and delayed condensations.)
AFAIK, e$pam is not edited and not a digest. But there might be
parental control ... :-)
> At 9:57 AM -0700 9/13/97, jf_avon@citenet.net wrote:
> >Hi.
> >
> >I've been lazily following the crypto-control issue through e$pam
> >list.
>
> Read the real list.
Tim, there are a lot of important issues in life, and crypto is only
one of them. I value your opinion a lot and find most of your
comments to be not only valid but even often wise. But of course,
as a CP highness, you seems to sometimes forget :-) that:
1) CP is carrier to so much things that I don't find interesting
2) every second wasted never comes back
3) some of my other interests requires as much time as CP, mostly
Canadian Firearms Digest where locally, we Canucks, are fighting a
battle you are no stranger with, only we got it worse than you
Yankees.
4) IMO, crypto has to be a useful tool to be interesting. I am more
interested in improving life than in building aesthetic mathematical
algorithms. And the most direct way to achieve this is anonymous
e-$, not guns.
5) fighting for privacy rights will be irrelevant when govt will have
been starved to extinction by e-$.
6) If I subtract from my awake time my working time, my eating time,
my washing time, my ****ing time and my domestic chores time, it
leaves me with time I can do whatever I want. This remaining time is
always too short.
7) After several weeks of being on CP and e$pam and e$
simultaneously, I found that I can read most of you posts on
CP via e$pam, great thanks to RAH. RAH seems to forward everything
that is even remotely related to e-$. Unless RAH has a
Machielavelous plan to induce everybody in error, for the time being,
he does a great job. I subscribe from times to times to CP for
random durations at random moments just to cross-check theses things.
My last year long absence from CP was caused by entirely other
things. I had no time for any net stuff at all.
> As a comment, sometimes when I try to "reply to all" to these messages from
> folks reading digests, I get "you are not a member of this list" or "this
> is a private list" messages.
Why don't you try jf_avon@citenet.net? :-) Get a decent mailer and
you'll find it's easy... :-)
> Fine, but it's why I won't waste time on folks who may not even see what I
> write unless I address it to them personally.
So now, do you propose mandatory voluntary subscription to some
mailing lists? :-) Never thought about telepathy? Or becoming a
prominent TV figure so that *everybody* (well, almost...) would be
force-fed to TM-Stuff (tm) ? :-) OK, OK, I push it a bit
but why should I have to suffer the intelligent and down to the point
discussions on CP if I consider that I have other better things to
do? The issue comes down to the respect of the Individual. Could I,
pe-lease, have my own interests? Pe-lease?
As for your perception of "loosing time on folks [snip]", I opinate
that it is an error from you. Although I am off from CP, I recently
ordered Applied Crypto (at last, I found the money...), and I plan to
give a small introduction talk to various persons and groups. I make
*every* *damn* *efforts* to spread PGP with everybody I know,
distributing software and keys.
But you see, if you say to somebody : this will encrypt your
communications" they don't give a shit.
If you explain to them the digital telephony bill, the current
tapping capability, the various moves that the govt is currently
doing, *and* crypto through the e-$ applications *and* political
consequences of e-$, *then* they *really* do get interested.
In my own experience, introducing the topic by the e-$/govt-intrusion
door is what gets them the motivation to learn text-based
plain-vanilla PGP. And as I said in an earlier post, the more they
get their money confiscated in the name of the Great Unwashed
Happiness, the more they get interested.
So, "that folk" is one it is unwise to neglect, he just gets
overwhelmed by the sheer volume of stuff on CP. Most of the
discouraged just unsubscribe and a few rare stick to it in diverse,
indirect ways. The ones who stick to it might just be the most
persistent of them all.
> JF, get a decent mailer and get on the real list if you want to participate.
I use Pegasus Mail V2.53 with a kill file verging on the terabyte
thank you. And I don't want to "participate", I want to exchange
ideas. Peoples who want to do so with me will do so. If it is too
much work to include me in your replies, just don't bother.
> Oh, and "cypherpunks@toad.com"
Please send me a valid name so I can keep posting to CP without
suffering the irrelevant-to-my-interests stuff, in full confidence
that RAH will keep doing it's fantastic job of forwarding your
most-of-the-time-interesting-to-me posts.
Ciao Tim
Ciao all
jfa
--
Jean-Francois Avon, Pierrefonds(Montreal) QC Canada
DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee
Finest of Limoges porcelain and crystal
JFA Technologies, R&D consultants
physicists and engineers, LabView programing.
PGP encryption keys at:
http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html
ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891
ID# 5B51964D : 152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C
Return to September 1997
Return to “jf_avon@citenet.net”
1997-09-14 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800) - Re: Real issue of crypto controls: security or taxation loss? - jf_avon@citenet.net