From: jf_avon@citenet.net
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: d7dfb3bc8310f05f10469a6222f4032ffdd2c0c69257c0a1bcf7f5a94554a5ea
Message ID: <199709140128.VAA28971@cti06.citenet.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-14 01:29:48 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800
From: jf_avon@citenet.net
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Real issue of crypto controls: security or taxation loss?
Message-ID: <199709140128.VAA28971@cti06.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On 13 Sep 97 at 23:44, iang@systemics.com wrote:
> The battle should remain on the field of personal rights, because the
> battle over economics cannot be won, right at this current juncture in
> time. I.e., Now.
Probably a sensible opinion. But what would be the effect of pulling
in the other direction? Espcially if the population would be more
personnally concerned with it? The way it is now, National Security
is a scarecrow but the real thing is the govt corn to be protected...
> As TCM will no doubt never tire of saying, the deployment of appropriate
> infrastructure is something that takes time. Until the deployment of
> all that juicy stuff is in place, nobody can provide a single transaction
> of your three-orders-of-magnitude-reality.
Only, to deploy any e-$ scheme would need an environment where govt
would _tolerate_ crypto. But the way it is going, everything is set
in place to trample on anybody's face that will use crypto with the
"not-the-flavour-of-the-month-at-White-House" sauce such as e-$
programmers, etc.
If the debate could be shifted-off, the legitimacy of the govt
claimed goals could get strongly challenged. This is possible only
if there is a cause that concerns citizens directly. Now, try
telling me that taxation is the most popular of govt's measures...
The fact that a majority voted for Politician A does not mean
that a majority loves him...
> Of course this raises the interesting question of why the establishment
> does not shift the battle themselves ...
Precisely. IMO, there is more hidden under there than meets the
eye. What if we try prying at this tiny, well concealed crack in the
big wall?
Ciao
jfa
--
Jean-Francois Avon, Pierrefonds(Montreal) QC Canada
DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee
Finest of Limoges porcelain and crystal
JFA Technologies, R&D consultants
physicists and engineers, LabView programing.
PGP encryption keys at:
http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html
ID# C58ADD0D : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891
ID# 5B51964D : 152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C
Return to September 1997
Return to “jf_avon@citenet.net”
1997-09-14 (Sun, 14 Sep 1997 09:29:48 +0800) - Re: Real issue of crypto controls: security or taxation loss? - jf_avon@citenet.net