From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Message Hash: f160c936511b1cd6f91d0ce87066adc726efdf08cdd93afa302223238b2ba505
Message ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970919111055.16362F-100000@eskimo.com>
Reply To: <v03102803b0485e0bfefd@[207.167.93.63]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-19 18:33:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:33:07 +0800
From: Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 1997 02:33:07 +0800
To: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Subject: Re: sooner or later
In-Reply-To: <v03102803b0485e0bfefd@[207.167.93.63]>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970919111055.16362F-100000@eskimo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Fri, 19 Sep 1997, Tim May wrote:
> You mean like the way the ban on drugs was impractical and could be skirted
> in various ways, forcing the ban on drugs to "go away"?
The ban on alcohol went away, why not the ban on drugs? It won't even
require a constitutional amendment. Are you being sarcastic or agreeing
with me?
In any case, the analogy between crypto and drugs is interesting. Perhaps
after the ban many people will obtain their crypto and crypto-related
services from organized crime.
Return to September 1997
Return to “Wei Dai <weidai@eskimo.com>”