From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: f5a02529eac233b3dc7ddefb0bf2f9a786ee7d7475c119b7505745f6d7c679bc
Message ID: <32a47212ab68bda3923a472826c01e98@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-09-27 23:29:30 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 07:29:30 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 1997 07:29:30 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Digital Postage (fwd)
Message-ID: <32a47212ab68bda3923a472826c01e98@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Jim Choate wrote:
>[Tim May wrote: ed.]
>> Some will remail for some form of digital postage. Some will charge too little, some too much.
>> Some will adjust their prices based on market/customer reactions. And so on.
>
>And there are a couple of problems with this:
>
> - it relies on a mechanism not currently in place to interface with
> other more traditional financial institutions. Which I might add
> don't look upon this as the most trustworthy mechanism.
Ecash is in place right now.
> - how do you charge for the postage, per submission? What happens when
> I want to send 10,000 parties the email. Do I still pay the digi-postage
> equivalent of $.35? Or do I pay $350.00?
This is easily worked out between the remailer operator and the
customer. Were I running a remailer, I would charge $350.00. As a
customer, I would not see this as unreasonable.
> What about intermediate remailers and their desire to get a cut
> of the pie?
Each hop should charge, of course. They are all providing the same
service.
>I suspect that anon remailers will operate by something similar to
>ISP's where when the account is setup some fee is paid for use and
>not on a use by use based fee. The problem with that is it creates a
>'concrete' link between the party desiring anonymity and the remailer
>operator that may be exploited in some (most? all?) cases to break
>that anonymity.
The way to break the concrete link is with blinded credentials. Of
course, ecash already provides this feature without the hassle of
opening an account with a remailer operator, writing and deploying new
software, etc. etc.
Monty Cantsin
Editor in Chief
Smile Magazine
http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html
http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQEVAwUBNC14U5aWtjSmRH/5AQHk1Qf+PTnZJmiFr3sFSvfoH51a/mpuhS4OhFJq
HjVJhG1BIKcQjm2i4V/lZPqjKaUUD+UMpZcQb6KKy6OgHxYJwZlmCW+xnWslmTEH
RMoBa6NUZS0xv8vhrOkpv+v/5CArowqaeTV/+P1q98E6SPhzgL1EpTLUZ8+M8LfC
H1duBAL3xNNcVj9ZWnh6UyVKh7cCtCQOTZyDxtHXWovzrxuAKpsUVWcpF5IEoy1O
k8Bv5vOUYKvxdEdVF9xSos7d8VvPgzWX+err1gtrZqVux4/nVg5EFfE/NghpGPVp
2pBY+Vq3iPdE6kUR6Qff7NJHtHClXUyHg+Ya9tyEDkGl+SuYz+JWMw==
=28IQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to September 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-09-27 (Sun, 28 Sep 1997 07:29:30 +0800) - Re: Digital Postage (fwd) - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>