From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@best.com>
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Message Hash: 028b9b765b2223cda4a7b8baf390d2bc03bbdc0af06899a3b9d5f554415bdcfb
Message ID: <199710150254.CAA00671@fountainhead.net>
Reply To: <3.0.3.32.19971013233228.006e7940@popd.ix.netcom.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-14 23:26:58 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 07:26:58 +0800
From: Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@best.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 07:26:58 +0800
To: stewarts@ix.netcom.com (Bill Stewart)
Subject: Re: GOST
In-Reply-To: <3.0.3.32.19971013233228.006e7940@popd.ix.netcom.com>
Message-ID: <199710150254.CAA00671@fountainhead.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text
Bill Stewart wrote:
> S-box structure is one of the critical issues in designing
> Feistel-type networks; if you understand the mathematics
> very very well, you can do it yourself, and if you don't,
> then you don't understand it well enough to be sure
> the S-boxes are secure enough, and thus you shouldn't
> be selling it to customers.
Thanks, I shall look up Feistel-type networks. Nope, I don't
understand the mathematics very very well, and that's why I
asked. While I haven't seen the official GOST specs but all
the reference I could find indicates that GOST specs don't
discuss the process of generating SBOX permutations and GOST
sboxes are not mathematically understood.
Regarding the developer's ethical responsibilities with experimental
technology I rather have the consumer decide (and of course
document the limitations).
Thanks,
Vipul
--
Powell lingered. "How's Earth?"
It was a conventional enough question and Muller gave the
conventional answer, "Still spinning."
-- "Reason", Asimov.
==================================================================
Vipul Ved Prakash | - Electronic Security & Crypto
vipul@best.com | - Web Objects
91 11 2233328 | - PERL Development
198 Madhuban IP Extension | - Linux & Open Systems
Delhi, INDIA 110 092 | - Networked Virtual Spaces
Return to October 1997
Return to “Vipul Ved Prakash <vipul@best.com>”