From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
To: spencer_ante@webmagazine.com
Message Hash: 035767162230c90511cc2203d1baf28770f1bf0de79225b30cdac626320d7cbf
Message ID: <v03102805b0742b687194@[207.167.93.63]>
Reply To: <88256538.00787D24.00@pcwhub.pcworld.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-22 22:29:10 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 06:29:10 +0800
From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 06:29:10 +0800
To: spencer_ante@webmagazine.com
Subject: Re: PGP, Inc.--What were they thinking?
In-Reply-To: <88256538.00787D24.00@pcwhub.pcworld.com>
Message-ID: <v03102805b0742b687194@[207.167.93.63]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 3:08 PM -0700 10/22/97, spencer_ante@webmagazine.com wrote:
>With all due respect to Tim May:
>
>As a person whose been at work on a very long feature about PGP Inc. for
>Wired, I can tell you that businesses really don't care that much about
>PGP's civil liberties advocacy. In fact, its rep could hurt as much as help
>them. The Fortune 500 is much more pragmatic: They want solutions that
I agree that the civil liberties side of PGP is of no interest to
corporations...in fact, it scare them a great deal. Talking about how Hamas
is using PGP to communicate so that the Zionist entity government cannot
successfully wiretap the freedom fighters is not something IS managers like
to hear about.
I agree that PGP, Inc. is apparently recasting itself as a supplier to IS
departments and bean counters.
>work, that help them maintain security for their intellectual property and
>capital. To that extent, PGP 5.5--which enables IS directors to manage a
>public key infrastructure and enforce company-wide security policies-- is a
>step in the right direction.
>
>But with this new product, I agree that they run the risk of alienating
>their core user group of cypherpunks and hackers. Encryption is a very
>complicated topic that doesn't lend itself well to sloganeering and
>histrionics. And one major thing that needs to be pointed out: PGP's key
If you are implying that my words are "sloganeering and histrionics," I
think you're way off-base.
I suggest you start reading the points being debated in more detail, and
think about the deeper issues.
--Tim May
The Feds have shown their hand: they want a ban on domestic cryptography
---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:----
Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money,
ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero
W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets,
Higher Power: 2^2,976,221 | black markets, collapse of governments.
"National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."
Return to October 1997
Return to “Tim May <tcmay@got.net>”