From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 08d318b7619eed0b535e3efadc167738741467e398c416551c18833bb47cdc8a
Message ID: <v031107e0b05b0494f712@[139.167.130.248]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-03 20:45:07 UTC
Raw Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 04:45:07 +0800
From: Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 04:45:07 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: legal question of DSA-based signatures?
Message-ID: <v031107e0b05b0494f712@[139.167.130.248]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
--- begin forwarded text
X-Sender: kaye@popd.ix.netcom.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 12:18:36 -0700
Reply-To: Digital Signature discussion <DIGSIG@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
Sender: Digital Signature discussion <DIGSIG@VM.TEMPLE.EDU>
From: Kaye Caldwell <kaye@IX.NETCOM.COM>
Subject: Re: legal question of DSA-based signatures?
To: DIGSIG@VM.TEMPLE.EDU
The document to which this refers is posted at:
http://www.softwareIndustry.org/issues/docs-org/cg-opinion.pdf
At 01:23 PM 10/3/97 -0400, you wrote:
>I think I already know the answer to this, but it might be fun to have the
>word with the bark on it...
>
>If you reply to this, I'll pass it on to the cypherpunks list.
>
>Notice that the question comes through an anonymous remailer.
>
>Cheers,
>Bob Hettinga
>--- begin forwarded text
>
>
>Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 12:17:32 -0400
>From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
>Comments: This message was remailed by a FREE automated
> remailing service. For additional information on this service,
> send a message with the subject "remailer-help" to
> remailer@anon.efga.org. The body of the message will be
> discarded. To report abuse, contact the operator at
> admin@anon.efga.org. Headers below this point were
> inserted by the original sender.
>Subject: legal question of DSA-based signatures?
>To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
>Sender: owner-cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
>Precedence: bulk
>Reply-To: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
>X-Loop: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
>
>I have before me a statement made by Information Security Corp.:
>
>"The Comptroller General has ruled that, for the purposes of electronic
>commerce, DSA-based digital signatures are as legally binding as hand-
>written signatures."
>
>Can anyone verify this?
>
>--- end forwarded text
>
>
>
>-----------------
>Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
>e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
>"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
>[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
>experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
>The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/
>Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http:www.fc98.ai>
>
>
--- end forwarded text
-----------------
Robert Hettinga (rah@shipwright.com), Philodox
e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA
"... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,
[predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to
experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'
The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/
Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http:www.fc98.ai>
Return to October 1997
Return to “Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>”
1997-10-03 (Sat, 4 Oct 1997 04:45:07 +0800) - Re: legal question of DSA-based signatures? - Robert Hettinga <rah@shipwright.com>