1997-10-23 - (Fwd from f-c) Note from PGP employee on MRK

Header Data

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 1760460e1e060bfe98ef9c81aa7c1c77e5f4eb2d2e629deef1c2841e750cc448
Message ID: <v03007808b074685bfedd@[204.254.21.122]>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-23 05:07:38 UTC
Raw Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 13:07:38 +0800

Raw message

From: Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 13:07:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: (Fwd from f-c) Note from PGP employee on MRK
Message-ID: <v03007808b074685bfedd@[204.254.21.122]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



>X-POP3-Rcpt: declan@relay.pathfinder.com
>Subject: Re: PGP, Inc.--What were they thinking?
>Date: Wed, 22 Oct 97 20:38:14 -0400
>x-sender: Jamie-McCarthy.org@mm.mailbank.com
>From: Jamie McCarthy <jamie@mccarthy.org>
>To: <fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu>
>cc: "Jason Bobier" <jason@pgp.com>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Sender: owner-fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
>X-Loop: fight-censorship@vorlon.mit.edu
>X-FC-URL: Fight-Censorship is at http://www.eff.org/~declan/fc/
>X-FC-URL: To join send "subscribe" to fight-censorship-request@vorlon.mit.edu
>
>A friend of mine by the name of Jason Bobier <jason@pgp.com> happens
>to work at PGP, Inc.  I'll preface his comments by pointing out that
>I'm sure he doesn't speak for the company in any way.
>
>> Unfortunately these people just don't get it. Corporations refused
>> to buy 5.0 because it did not have any way for the corps to get at
>> email encrypted to their employees. There are some very legitimate
>> uses of this, such as when an employee dies and someone else has
>> to take over for them.
>>
>> Without corps buying the product, there is no PGP, Inc., and thus
>> no dedication of resources to the production of PGP. This leads us
>> back to the floundering state of development that PGP was in
>> before 5.0.
>>
>> They also don't seem to realize that you always have the ability
>> to remove the MRK from your list of recipients.
>>
>> Sometimes I really feel like screaming at these people. _All_ of
>> the developers at PGP are personal privacy zealots and no one
>> likes the idea of the MRK. That is why we refuse to make them
>> required. It is also why there still are freeware and personal
>> versions of the product. I wish they would just realize that we
>> aren't some evil group of people that are solely plotting how to
>> make the most money off of this. Most everyone at PGP has
>> internalized personal privacy as a cause (actually most had it
>> before they joined PGP).
>>
>> *sigh* OK, enough ranting. Feel free to quote various parts of
>> this if you feel like responding to the list.
>>
>> Jason
>
>
>--
> Jamie McCarthy                       new email => jamie@mccarthy.org
> homepage: http://www.absence.prismatix.com/jamie/
>   fan of: http://www.nizkor.org/
>







Thread