1997-10-13 - Re: Phone Line Internet (too slow)

Header Data

From: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 204e8992936974e95ecd85c023e0f6286fd3e8e3806ec79f7226730368ded32b
Message ID: <34424DC4.E51DD8A5@ssds.com>
Reply To: <199710121344.PAA20721@basement.replay.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-13 16:45:09 UTC
Raw Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:45:09 +0800

Raw message

From: Jim Burnes <jim.burnes@ssds.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:45:09 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Phone Line Internet (too slow)
In-Reply-To: <199710121344.PAA20721@basement.replay.com>
Message-ID: <34424DC4.E51DD8A5@ssds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Anonymous wrote:

> Inter@ctive WeekOctober 10, 1997
>
>                       Nortel Unveils 1-Megabit Phone Line
>                       Ethernet
>
>

etc etc...

>                       The 1-Meg will deliver 1-megabit-per-second speeds
> downstream
>                       into homes or businesses and
> 120-kilobit-per-second speeds in the
>                       other direction

This is too slow upstream for future technology needs.  I'll admit that the

upstream is almost as fast as a 2B+D ISDN setup, but research that I've
done suggest that 384kb is necessary for VHS quality realtime video.

So Nortel will deliver enough downstream bandwith for you to be a video
consumer, but not a provider.  How typical.

I'll wait for xDSL, thank you.

Jim Burnes


--

      "How do you explain school to higher intelligence?"
               Elliot to his brother in ET








Thread