1997-10-19 - Re: Is PGP still private?

Header Data

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 22f0e726f400e159724912358b11f4cf4e64a597d326a4111864519c80260d75
Message ID: <199710190155.DAA10077@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-19 02:15:33 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 10:15:33 +0800

Raw message

From: Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 1997 10:15:33 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Is PGP still private?
Message-ID: <199710190155.DAA10077@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



> Your reencryption scheme fails because of the management of the short
> term encryption keys, among other things.

Wait a minute.  Didn't Adam abandon the reencryption idea and switch to
key escrow?  Or did that one turn out to be a non-starter too?

Thread

• Return to October 1997

• Return to “Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>”

• Return to “Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>”

• 1997-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 10:15:33 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Anonymous <nobody@REPLAY.COM>
  • 1997-10-19 (Sun, 19 Oct 1997 17:32:58 +0800) - Re: Is PGP still private? - Adam Back <aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk>