From: “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>
To: “Jim Choate” <cypherpunks@ssz.com>
Message Hash: 23130f953a376dcfc6821783d70d263d08f1fa17c27683d19fe83ba27ee83b60
Message ID: <199710052028.QAA05930@mx02.together.net>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-05 21:02:08 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 05:02:08 +0800
From: "Brian B. Riley" <brianbr@together.net>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 05:02:08 +0800
To: "Jim Choate" <cypherpunks@ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Traffic Analysis (fwd)
Message-ID: <199710052028.QAA05930@mx02.together.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 10/5/97 1:18 PM, Jim Choate (ravage@ssz.com) passed this wisdom:
>> Subject: Re: Traffic Analysis (fwd)
>> Date: Sun, 5 Oct 97 11:59:53 -0400
>>
>> On 10/3/97 10:49 AM, Jim Choate (ravage@ssz.com) passed this
>> wisdom:
>>
>>>If the MTBF for a remailer is n then the MTBF for m remailers
>>>is n*m. Inother words the remailer chain gets less reliable as
>>>it gets longer.
>>
>> Jim, you want to take a look at that "n*m" again ... it
>>doesn't wash. means MTBF goes *up* which means *more* reliable.
>
>Remember n is a fraction, failures/time_period ...
>
>If your MTBF is 1 failure per year for each system and you have 10
>systems your MTBF is 10 failures per year. Looks like multiplication
>to me....
Maybe I have been away from hardcore engineering for too long, but
last time I checked MTBF (Mean Time Between Failures) is measured in
time (seconds, minutes, hours etc) not in failures per year that would
be called 'failure rate'
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0
Charset: noconv
iQA/AwUBNDf4WMdZgC62U/gIEQJy/QCeKTFBl+4yLC4mDnr/32uh8w8rbLsAn086
Y+veBvWn4ULlxuJBT0+Bun4N
=7xHN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr
For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key>
"One of the deep mysteries to me is our logo, the symbol of lust
and knowledge, bitten into, all crossed with in the colors of the
rainbow in the wrong order. You couldn't dream of a more
appropriate logo: lust, knowledge, hope, and anarchy."
-- Gassee - Apple Logo
Return to October 1997
Return to ““Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>”
1997-10-05 (Mon, 6 Oct 1997 05:02:08 +0800) - Re: Traffic Analysis (fwd) - “Brian B. Riley” <brianbr@together.net>