1997-10-21 - Re: SMTP Encryption Exten

Header Data

From: harka@nycmetro.com
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Message Hash: 25f78251ea3a14040a31c025bd95624cadfa105545641ba5595257d4ca187e72
Message ID: <199710212104.QAA11860@einstein.ssz.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-21 20:43:06 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 04:43:06 +0800

Raw message

From: harka@nycmetro.com
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 1997 04:43:06 +0800
To: CYPHERPUNKS@ssz.com
Subject: Re: SMTP Encryption Exten
Message-ID: <199710212104.QAA11860@einstein.ssz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

 -=> Quoting In:ericm@lne.com to Harka <=-

 In> If your mail goes to an intermediate MX site, it'll sit in the
 In> clear on the disk there until its sent to its final
 In> destination.  Even if all mailers supported ssmtp, the mail
 In> would not be secure.

True, but an encrypted tunnel to fetch your e-mail will at least
render wiretaps on your phone-line useless. While that doesn't
really matter if all your e-mail is PGP-encrypted, the truth is that
a lot of e-mail is still in the clear. That at least would be
protected to a degree...

Btw., does anybody know if there's an crypto-enhanced direct-dial-up
program such as minicom out there?

Ciao

Harka

... "Use a Cipher - Be Free!"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQEVAgUBNE0TyjltEBIEF0MBAQEsawf/SyzCJ5vHC9gvn9aX4Efuxt9rNe6UqXoh
78ZpKba5X0QvkvPyG+4TAopLZUXL5Qjs5TKQmEhBcCnw4+bHv36T4nzaDPNKsD39
RFtCddWgpF1pIUQ7GIdY/mMTh5UGMibXgqU9Z1kZKP0j8pJJPn4aK1uSas+Yne69
/OdDX3PBBgbw66DxOqjdE6+pC0v5LS1janXUuEMXo8nV1MfpBnStI9ORAcyNeCtu
H8KlnQcLwUhuEnTn/VeEwRZJIFPf3hUFcuxVdcooHgqDbY9d+zbSsFiqVE3EyMji
bSiBTMK9N/jQ7VFllhkqLihJbA/Q27KP4M6hV4NMqDdh3Sfv6Bd7iw==
=jbpL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


If encryption is outlawed, only outlaws will have encryption...






Thread