1997-10-06 - Unicorn an NSA agent? WAS: New PGP “Everything the FBI ever dre

Header Data

From: jf_avon@citenet.net
To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com, cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Message Hash: 307e58f40c1a103acb0d9836c764be34784e5c95a5c959066d64e63e338f82fb
Message ID: <199710060244.WAA16373@cti06.citenet.net>
Reply To: <v03110705b05bfc2bc63c@[139.167.130.248]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-06 02:46:44 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:46:44 +0800

Raw message

From: jf_avon@citenet.net
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:46:44 +0800
To: e$@thumper.vmeng.com, cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Unicorn an NSA agent?  WAS: New PGP "Everything the FBI ever dre
In-Reply-To: <v03110705b05bfc2bc63c@[139.167.130.248]>
Message-ID: <199710060244.WAA16373@cti06.citenet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Unicorn wrote:

>  borderline activity.  It's hardly a settled point.  That you are so quick
>  to advocate corporate ownership of potentially private e-mail out of hand
>  and without argument tells us much about your real position, Mr.
>  Moscaritolo.  Three words:  "Expectation of Privacy."

Unicorn,

In that piece of knowledge smashing, just as you do in most 
of your posts, you again mixed up things to make sure that everybody 
end up knowing less than when they started.

It is peoples like you that ended up with using Expectation of 
Privacy out of it's rightfull context.  Apart from various rulings of 
various judges that probably smoked various  herbs, can you please 
tell me how anybody can rightfully expect privacy when everything 
that permits them to exchange information is *owned* by somebody else 
and that the use of this equipment is there *only* for the activities 
of the owner of the equipment?  If it weren't of the business, the 
damn computer wouldn't be there.  And beside, the employee is not 
paid to chat with friends, he's paid to work.  If he doesn't want to 
work, just fine, but not on the company's pay...

Somehow, you basic premises always blows my mind.  I think that you 
are a *very* dangerous person.  I've been watching you for almost 
three years over Cypherpunks and e$-etc and other forums.   
Virtually *all* of your posts have this 
blow-up-their-basic-premises-and-let-them-with-nothing-but-confusion  
style.  Your style shows intelligence and skill in the way you do 
it, which rules out idiocy on your part.  So, clearly, you have 
an agenda. 

I cannot help but having the nagging feeling that you're on  some 
three-letter agency payroll because you have the uncanny habit of 
disrupting and diverting some important discussion.  I always wanted 
to killfile you but always refrained to do so just to be able to read 
the last finely crafted basic premises-smashing abomination.

So, again, which of the three-letter agency sends you a paycheck?  
Or are you doing is only for a secret decoration?

jfa
-- 
Jean-Francois Avon, Pierrefonds(Montreal) QC Canada
 DePompadour, Societe d'Importation Ltee
    Finest of Limoges porcelain and crystal
 JFA Technologies, R&D consultants
    physicists and engineers, LabView programing.
PGP encryption keys at:
   http://w3.citenet.net/users/jf_avon
   http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html
ID# C58ADD0D  : 529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 
ID# 5B51964D  : 152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C






Thread