From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Message Hash: 31abfef61ccab9ba24c44e28ae87291007fe3549a1784bc30b14a890f94b4b87
Message ID: <1cce1b1e16a2b155d266ad70e94abd78@anon.efga.org>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-10 02:11:38 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:11:38 +0800
From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:11:38 +0800
To: cypherpunks@cyberpass.net
Subject: Re: Applying ``Crowds'' idea to anonymous e-cash.
Message-ID: <1cce1b1e16a2b155d266ad70e94abd78@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Lucky Green wrote:
>On Thu, 9 Oct 1997, John Kelsey wrote:
>> Crowds, for those who haven't seen it, is a way of giving web users
>> partial anonymity by making it impossible to determine which member
>> of some ``crowd'' of users did some action (such as requesting a
>> document). (This is a very rough summary--read the paper for the
>> real analysis.)
>
>Some people from MSFT proposed a similar concept at FC'97. As for its
>real life value, the legal term for such a system is "conspiracy".
Almost everything we do could be called "conspiracy".
John has a good idea here. Let's give it room to grow.
Return to October 1997
Return to “Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>”
1997-10-10 (Fri, 10 Oct 1997 10:11:38 +0800) - Re: Applying ``Crowds’’ idea to anonymous e-cash. - Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>