From: Anonymous <anon@anon.efga.org>
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 00:53:39 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stronghold
Message-ID: <e6e0fb4d2a64ca578e34ae954089e2f9@anon.efga.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Anonymous wrote:
| C2 is obviously deperate to suppress the information that's already
known to
| an increasing number of people in the field. Their threats against
Vulis may
| be one of the reasons why none of the security experts, who confirmed
the
| presense of serious security flaws in Stronghold, are saying much
about this.

The information regarding the security flaws in Stronghold comes at a
pretty dear price currently. With the increasing value of this type of
information in the corporate underworld, the bugs and backdoors in
security software that are revealed to the world make up only a small
portion of those that are known to exist by those who have the funds
to purchase them.
For every free spirit who publishes a security flaw, there are a dozen
enterpreneurs who recognize the value of the information they hold.

MoneyMonger