1997-10-24 - Re: PGP Employee on MKR

Header Data

From: mark@unicorn.com
To: aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk
Message Hash: 3f1ce4efcf0fce5cfd0946c86a30232c14545a216e99f608e721a2b5224626ca
Message ID: <877707423.648.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-24 15:43:11 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:43:11 +0800

Raw message

From: mark@unicorn.com
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 1997 23:43:11 +0800
To: aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk
Subject: Re: PGP Employee on MKR
Message-ID: <877707423.648.193.133.230.33@unicorn.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



aba@dcs.ex.ac.uk wrote:

> We didn't say: "don't have disaster recovery for stored data."  (Well
> I didn't and I don't think Mark did either).

Yep. While there are much better options, I think PGP's CMR would be a
tolerable short-term solution for stored data. The problem is that it's
not for stored data, it's for email (or so 'Commerical MESSAGE Recovery')
would imply.

Note that solely using CMR for stored data would not require that the CMR
'feature' be built into freeware or personal versions of PGP, but only into
the corporate version. That in itself would be a big win.

    Mark






Thread