From: phelix@vallnet.com
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 1997 17:56:47 +0800
To: cypherpunks@Algebra.COM
Subject: Re: Stronghold
Message-ID: <343b60e7.102167602@128.2.84.191>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



On 5 Oct 1997 00:21:33 -0500, nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) wrote:

>
>John Young wrote:
>> Dimitri:
>> Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using
>> the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or
>> inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold.
>
>Unless C2Net publicly announces that Dimitri is free to post 
>anything he chooses about C2Net and the software they produce,
>without threat of lawsuit or prosecution, then it is patently
>unfair to castigate him for failing to share whatever information
>he may have in regard to their product.
>Like it or not, C2Net has declared that the integrity of their
>product is dependent upon men with guns who have the power to
>take people before the inquisitors, squelching all intimations
>of weakness or impropriety in the design of their product.
>

Use the remailers.  That's what they're there for.  Am I being overly
simplistic here?  

-- Phelix