From: Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
To: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer <cypherpunks@ssz.com>
Message Hash: 4a760eaa9bbceb49d66920d78b21852070527dba8d5b4b7d34ecc573c7b27b45
Message ID: <19971026003520.35384@bywater.songbird.com>
Reply To: <199710252128.QAA30492@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-26 07:41:01 UTC
Raw Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 15:41:01 +0800
From: Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 1997 15:41:01 +0800
To: Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer <cypherpunks@ssz.com>
Subject: Re: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199710252128.QAA30492@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <19971026003520.35384@bywater.songbird.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
On Sat, Oct 25, 1997 at 04:28:52PM -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
> Forwarded message:
>
> > Date: Sat, 25 Oct 1997 13:52:05 -0700
> > From: Tim May <tcmay@got.net>
> > Subject: Orthogonality and Disaster Recovery
>
> > One of the themes of modern computing I strongly support is that of
> > "orthogonality," or clean functionality.
>
> Any idea how a term meaning 'at right angles' came to hold all the various
> interpretations it now does?...
>
> I see this word in a lot of my reading and it almost never implies any sort
> of 'indipendent multi-variant reference system'.
I can't believe that you haven't studied vector spaces, Jim. In that
particular niche of mathematics, the meaning you quote is precisely the
meaning of 'orthogonal'. Vector algebra underlies a very large part
of mathematics, and modern physics would not exist without it.
--
Kent Crispin "No reason to get excited",
kent@songbird.com the thief he kindly spoke...
PGP fingerprint: B1 8B 72 ED 55 21 5E 44 61 F4 58 0F 72 10 65 55
http://songbird.com/kent/pgp_key.html
Return to October 1997
Return to “Kent Crispin <kent@bywater.songbird.com>”