From: Andrew Bromage <bromage@cs.mu.oz.au>
To: zooko@xs4all.nl (Zooko Journeyman)
Message Hash: 4b836f12c00aae4336d7fdc0f0df0e691756753cd3dcf64ac2cd399791f2043c
Message ID: <199710142358.JAA02842@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
Reply To: <199710141053.MAA03610@xs1.xs4all.nl>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-15 00:09:04 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 08:09:04 +0800
From: Andrew Bromage <bromage@cs.mu.oz.au>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 08:09:04 +0800
To: zooko@xs4all.nl (Zooko Journeyman)
Subject: Re: commercial data recovery
In-Reply-To: <199710141053.MAA03610@xs1.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <199710142358.JAA02842@mundook.cs.mu.OZ.AU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
G'day all.
Zooko Journeyman wrote:
> I wonder if it is too much early-days to start talking about
> advanced protocols e.g. secret-splitting in IETF-Open-PGP?
One list member has encouraged me to write an internet-draft for a key
quorum system, so I am. The trouble is that my proposed implementation
needs some info that isn't in the current IETF draft (the format of the
"string to key" object).
Is it actually documented anywhere that we can access?
Cheers,
Andrew Bromage
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNEQHMBF7J5ORR6ohAQEtJQP/XlunlxxrKDwh0zlTBiWeURSvUbo3Lvup
vp+Ex9gyraWuX+eaIoioQw+iQ7uLlWxeCRPVlVrpsnYG4YJF7vO1QKVxHuTZEbXj
wUZyS8WXv+3TRjakCfKf2nNP6lDgYs2W67eZhmYzuwC/2uNn078DbAWg8TLcy1ji
GvKEy0n4pLI=
=4Ypn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Return to October 1997
Return to “Zooko Journeyman <zooko@xs4all.nl>”