From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
To: “John Kelsey” <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Message Hash: 5a7bcbad1119635a78ae5e371706858791af3475f01bd30d06d8e87f3539e8c9
Message ID: <v03007801b0675fedb3e4@[207.94.249.103]>
Reply To: <199710110651.BAA02401@email.plnet.net>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-13 06:52:43 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:52:43 +0800
From: Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:52:43 +0800
To: "John Kelsey" <cypherpunks@Algebra.COM>
Subject: Re: Defeating MITM with Eric's Secure Phone
In-Reply-To: <199710110651.BAA02401@email.plnet.net>
Message-ID: <v03007801b0675fedb3e4@[207.94.249.103]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
At 11:53 PM -0700 10/10/97, John Kelsey wrote:
>This is *almost* right. We need to add one more thing,
>though:
>
>1. Alice calls Mallory, thinking she's calling Bob.
>She reads the first three digits to him. He makes the
>connection fall apart. At the same time, Mallory calls Bob,
>pretending to be Alice, and causes the connection to fall
>apart at the same time.
John - You're absolutely right. I haven't had a phone connection fail
after connect for a coon's age, but I remember the bad old days of living
in GTE-land. (For example, the time I called my wife from work and she
asked me to call Kristine and have her call because no one in Los Gatos
could call out.)
A comm failure during authentication should be enough reason to go to the
next set of 16 words.
N.B. I was assuming that Alice would only commit one digit to Bob before
having Bob commit one digit to her. It seems from our analysis that doing
it one digit at a time greatly improves the chances of catching Mallory
early.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill Frantz | Internal surveillance | Periwinkle -- Consulting
(408)356-8506 | helped make the USSR the | 16345 Englewood Ave.
frantz@netcom.com | nation it is today. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA
Return to October 1997
Return to ““John Kelsey” <kelsey@plnet.net>”