1997-10-15 - Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports

Header Data

From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
To: Tobias Weingartner <weingart@natasha.brandonu.ca>
Message Hash: 602abca9a2575e56fb537396ec2678bfa5503254b96ca8b31f89cc0ba06ebc90
Message ID: <199710152134.PAA21613@harmony.village.org>
Reply To: <14196.876929326@natasha.brandonu.ca>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-15 23:46:02 UTC
Raw Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT)

Raw message

From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 1997 16:46:02 -0700 (PDT)
To: Tobias Weingartner <weingart@natasha.brandonu.ca>
Subject: Re: CVS: cvs.openbsd.org: ports
In-Reply-To: <14196.876929326@natasha.brandonu.ca>
Message-ID: <199710152134.PAA21613@harmony.village.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain


In message <14196.876929326@natasha.brandonu.ca> Tobias Weingartner writes:
: I've already made a similar message to the ports list.  It was shot down.
: But maybe now that we see the "trouble" with the current setup, we can
: re-evaluate that.  Personally, I think we could share 95% of the ports
: stuff between open/freebsd, but it would be nice to have the ability to
: fix things in a local cvs tree, without having to wait for the fix to go
: through channels.

I would like to support this 100%.  This would also help with the
-lcrypt problem, et al.

Recall that bsd.port.mk already supports this.  We can start doing it
right away...

Warner





Thread