1997-10-05 - Re: Stronghold

Header Data

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 6ab73ed1b9ee8ac4c1bc32aa009a22dc5c9287ea0ccc5be10559fbdfbcf541d8
Message ID: <199710051646.SAA26190@basement.replay.com>
Reply To: N/A
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-05 16:59:11 UTC
Raw Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 00:59:11 +0800

Raw message

From: nobody@REPLAY.COM (Anonymous)
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 00:59:11 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: Stronghold
Message-ID: <199710051646.SAA26190@basement.replay.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



John Young wrote:
> Dimitri, out with Stronghold's fault, if you've got it. C2, cut the
> legal bluff, it stinks. The badmouthing by both of you is the same old
> toxic waste -- and may mean the two of you're are now in cahoots
> to boost each other's shoddy goods and hide the faults behind a
> phony dispute, like 50 years of mock competitive Ameri-Russky
> junk national security communist-capitalist racketeering so beloved
> by die-hard globalist TLAs of business and government.

It is becoming increasingly obvious that John Young is the real
troublemaker here. I wouldn't doubt that it was John who was
behind the original troubles between Vulis and Sameer.
I think that John Young should be forcefully unsubscribed from
the Cypherpunks mailing lists. 

YoungMonger






Thread