From: George Spelvin <gs@dev.null>
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 05:48:50 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Fucking Minors / Re: NABMLA embattled -- mirror sites?
In-Reply-To: <34550336.162A@dev.null>
Message-ID: <34550789.259A@dev.null>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Human Gus-Peter wrote:
> Anonymous wrote:
> > I'm not sure the right to free speech includes the right to endorse guys
> > fucking little boys, whether they give it a moniker like "transgenerational
> > love" or not. Any sex with a minor is rape, since they can't legally give
> > consent.
> 
> That's right. People who are too lazy to drive a fourteen year old
> to New Mexico, where they can legally fuck their brains out, should
> go to jail for a long, long time.
> When I cruise the children's chat lines, I always tell them I would
> like to meet them in New Mexico and fuck their brains out. That's
> legal.

  I consider this issue so important that I thought it appropriate
to reply to it even before it arrived at the Cypherpunks mailing
list.
  I believe that people should be required by law to provide not
only their true identity when using the Internet for communications,
but should also be required to provide their true physical location,
so that law enforcement agencies will know whether what they are
writing is legal or illegal in the state from which they are 
sending the communication.
 
> What I love about the law is that it gives us clear guidelines to
> help us recognize the difference between those filthy fucking
> child-molesting perverts fucking fourteen year olds in California,
> and the decent, upstanding citizens fucking the fourteen year
> olds in New Mexico.

  Amen!
 
> God Bless America,
> LegallyFuckingFourteenYearOldsMonger

George Spelvin
"Legally fucking Eighteen Year Olds in California."