1997-10-03 - Re: CDA protects against liability

Header Data

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Message Hash: 72f1ba78247d342519f27bffa6c1bdaa3e2f03b7b87e38995bbfcb260a87079b
Message ID: <RwRyDe4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
Reply To: <v03007800b059a71da182@[168.161.105.141]>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-03 02:57:02 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:57:02 +0800

Raw message

From: dlv@bwalk.dm.com (Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM)
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 10:57:02 +0800
To: cypherpunks@toad.com
Subject: Re: CDA protects against liability
In-Reply-To: <v03007800b059a71da182@[168.161.105.141]>
Message-ID: <RwRyDe4w165w@bwalk.dm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain



Declan McCullagh <declan@well.com> writes:

> 
> Remember that the CDA "protects against liability" since the online
> services cut a deal during the legislative process.
> 
> In other words AOL & co lobbied to have provisions inserted to get them off
> the hook, even though individual users would still be screwed when the act
> became law.
> 
> Another case of corporations selling out civil liberties.

Remind me how some crypto-peddlers endorse bills that would criminalize
domestic crypto use in exchange for their being able to export their
(weak) systems.

---

Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM
Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps






Thread