1997-10-03 - Re: Digital Postage (fwd)
Header Data
From: “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>
To: ravage@ssz.com (Jim Choate)
Message Hash: 948d3c1204d9c687642f84d00a644d4f4514b68418ebb73673b760668213dd1b
Message ID: <199710030509.AAA00490@smoke.suba.com>
Reply To: <199709282104.QAA09234@einstein.ssz.com>
UTC Datetime: 1997-10-03 05:13:21 UTC
Raw Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:13:21 +0800
Raw message
From: "snow" <snow@smoke.suba.com>
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:13:21 +0800
To: ravage@ssz.com (Jim Choate)
Subject: Re: Digital Postage (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <199709282104.QAA09234@einstein.ssz.com>
Message-ID: <199710030509.AAA00490@smoke.suba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
He of the Hyperlong .sig said:
> Ask yourself this, how attractive would the Internet have been if it had
> required users to install and manage multiple communications protocols for
> every connection?
You mean like FTP, NNTP, HTTP, SMTP & etc.?
Rudy can't fail.
Thread
- Return to September 1997
Return to October 1997
- Return to “Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>”
- Return to “Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>”
Return to ““snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>”
- 1997-09-28 (Mon, 29 Sep 1997 05:00:56 +0800) - Re: Digital Postage (fwd) - Jim Choate <ravage@ssz.com>
- 1997-09-29 (Mon, 29 Sep 1997 14:47:03 +0800) - Re: Digital Postage (fwd) - Bill Frantz <frantz@netcom.com>
- 1997-10-03 (Fri, 3 Oct 1997 13:13:21 +0800) - Re: Digital Postage (fwd) - “snow” <snow@smoke.suba.com>